Business Disputes: Common Areas and 3 Different Ways of Solving

Business disputes relate to a characteristic feature of running commerce. Almost every entrepreneur in his/her life faced the need to resolve a conflict that hampered activities. As a rule, such problems spoil the mood and are financially depleted, although there are ways to minimize the costs of trade contradictions and to reach a mutual compromise as quickly as possible.

Common Areas of Business Dispute

Conflicts can arise because of any clause of a treaty or event. But owners of companies should navigate in potentially possible spheres of trouble, in order to have a chance to prevent them. Collaboration with contractors, customers, suppliers, is fraught with an emergence of disagreements on the basis of a signed contract. For instance, a store did not receive the products it expected, or business partner believes that it will not get all interest for the services rendered. In addition, the parties may review some of the rules of agreement or change its duration.

Another controversial point is the situation when consumers are dissatisfied with goods or facilities. Clients may also blame a businessman for not meeting the quality of items with generally accepted standards or even own expectations. Since firms provide legally certified guarantees for commodities.Their violation causes claims and litigation.

It should be aware of problems arising in connection with hiring or firing laborers. This is a hard task for the head, as federal laws regulate relations with an owner and are vigilant in observing the requirements for discrimination, persecution or other unsuitable working conditions. Thus, gender imbalance has a negative impact on the company’s image. It is useful to have a specialist in employment issues in the state to avoid trouble.

3 Main Ways of Solving Business Disputes

There is a list of mandatory steps will aid business partners to reduce the number of disputable situations. First of all, you should initially work out the principles and procedures for managing routine activities and transactions. Similar training reduces the likelihood of controversies.

For example, the availability of templates for drawing up contracts for the purchase of real estate will ensure their compliance with standard demands and monitoring of the necessary items required for implementation. A carefully thought out policy of dismissing employees will facilitate to evade accusations of discrimination. An optimized promotion of your products with all warnings and explanatory information will limit your responsibility for negligent buyers.

In any case, it is significant to have such papers in a written format. An oral bargain is reliable only with the support of friendly ties, so they are frequently violated. Treaties that are not properly implemented lead to disagreements related to the refusal of opponents to assume their responsibilities.

If despite all the efforts, you still did not manage to shun conflict, there are several ways to dispose of costly litigation. Small companies, as a rule, go to court on claims relating to outstanding promissory notes or employment issues. Although today more and more practiced a desire to permit the dispute on their own.

However, opponents reserve the right to use lawyers specializing in a certain field of law. Rivals are guided by the settlement of contradictions, and not by a competition of opinions. This practice works well when contenders have long-term business relationships.

This approach demonstrates the partners' strive to reach a compromise, but friction inevitably arises in the process of negotiations. Then the participants come to a standstill and require the assistance of a third, neutral side. Experts point to alternative solutions to the problem, which will be acceptable to the most demanding personalities.


If the court resolves the questions between rivals, guided by a legislative basis, then the powers of an arbitrator are based on the agreement of the parties. A dispute cannot be submitted to arbitrament without their consent. One of the obvious advantages of this way is the fact that the achieved result will have legal force outside the euro area.

When choosing an arbitration trial, carefully think over whom to turn to, in what language it should be conducted, how many experts to invite, etc. Although the referees are oriented to formal procedures and operations, so it is not superfluous to consult a specialist about a final verdict. Please note that not all controversies can be influenced by arbitration. Each country has its own rules. It is better to apply to referee if:

  • One of the partners is outside the EU;
  • Proceedings and evidence are provided in English;
  • Opponents tend to keep confidentiality about the dispute;
  • Contenders are interested in a quick resolution of the conflict;
  • Institute of conflict resolution has an excellent understanding of economic laws.


In addition to lawsuit and arbitration, “enemies”may also seek assistance from intermediaries. As a rule, this is a specialist with an unbiased attitude, trying to determine the needs of each partner and find common ground. He or she, like rivals, is interested in achieving a mutually beneficial trade-off.

Note that numerous international arbitration institutions offer intermediary services. But opponents can independently agree on mediation, choosing a trustee, not accidentally the proposed expert. In this case, they will be sure of his/her loyalty. It is worth discussing all the nuances of bringing an intercessor with your attorney. The difference between mediation and arbitration lies in the degree of binding decisions and format of the procedure.Mediation is acceptable if:

  • It is much more important to maintain good business relations after resolving the conflict than to win;
  • Partners want the maximum control over the subject of dispute and the procedure for its consideration.


Any business conflict could be solved in the courtroom. The right to appeal to the judicial system for justice is based on the constitution. Quite often the type of court is prescribed in the contract. If there is no such situation, federal law details the specialization of each law institution.

You may apply to an appropriate institution at the place of residence of the defendant. However,an act is considering other options, when it comes to contractual obligations. Trials can be the best method if:

  • Partners are located in the same country, speak the same language and observe the same cultural traditions;
  • For one of the parties the cost of service is essential;
  • A possibility of an appeal overcomes the chance to get a quick verdict;
  • Claims of opponents are not too large;
  • There are examples of successful conflict resolution in the required economic environment.

Thus, business environment can offer a variety of options to solve any dispute, from a court litigation to negotiation. The final choice depends on ambitions and aspirations of opponents. If victory is the priority, then it is better to turn to formalities. If you trust your partner, remember the intermediaries.